Your browser does not support or blocks cookies. The site will not function properly. Do not ask for support.


Quality
Source
Age
Show More...
Quality
Source
Age

Сomments

Shamylan realy tried to cough up some originality for this one, just felt really bland and boring to be honest. and the twist turned bad into dogsh!t, what a waste of time.
A seriously good film. Held back the tears a many times
4/10 is just about as much as I can give this film. I thought it was just silly
A good movie to watch once. Really... It's one of those movies, just to see, so to speak. Freddobar hit the nail on the head.. Two comments below mine. Idk about a 10/10... I'd give it an 8/10.
Quite the cast and a thoughtful story, the inner relationships and their outer counterparts all bring it together. You have to feel their fear then still wonder how could this be done. 8.5/10
A Different Kind of Horror. The Village is not a visual hack-them-up gore-fest like Saw (for example) nor is it a ghost story, it not a creepy-kid horror film and it is not a monster movie. Instead The Village is good story - within the story lies a horror which is plausible. The movie is a group of people wanting to get away from all the bad things in mainstream modern society and go back to a simpler, more peaceful way of living - or so they thought - and that is where the horror lies... away from modernism. 10/10
I just got around to watching this one and it turned out being a decent movie. It had a good cast too. I enjoyed the whole concept of the village and reason(s) behind its establishment. One-time watch for me but worth seeing.
This one got horrible reviews (Roger Ebert, whose reviews I usually adore, gave it 1 out of 4 stars, ouch!), but I'm so glad I took the time to watch it. Not as brilliant as Signs or Sixth Sense, but some lovely performances, a gorgeous soundtrack, and M. Night Shyamalan's patented moody storyline. I think it's a love-it-or-hate-it sort of film. I loved it. 9/10
July hasn't been a good month for the movies.

After DC Comic fans wouldn't go see Halle Berry ham it up in a stupid S & M outfit and thus, witnessing the apocalyptic catastrophe, "Catwoman" rightfully crash and burn at the box office (a pathetic 3rd Place opening with $17 Mil, finishing behind the tepid "I, Robot", a film that opened the week before it), "The Village" is a damn good breath of fresh air.

I did something before seeing this movie that I don't normally do: I read just about every critic's review of the film. I hate doing that for several reasons. For one, I always have their thoughts in my head and always find the faults they point out are magnified ten times larger than normal, two, I don't like spending time talking about other critics and three, I don't want to go in with any sort of expectations other than what I saw in the trailers and T.V. spots. I remedy all of this by just reading little quips or by-lines and then wait until I've seen the movie.

If you haven't read the reviews of this film, most have been highly critical of director M. Night Shyamalan who, after doing two weak movies, reloaded and turned out the fantastic ghost story, "The Sixth Sense". Somehow, in all his success, Night set himself up to fail. That film was so good and the twist at the end so mind-blowing, that he couldn't possibly live up to future releases. "Unbreakable" was a wonderful film giving us a glimpse of the mythical "hero's journey" and "Signs", while not very good, was effective in at least building tension before it finally petered out with no payoff.

So now, after you've read all of the above (I told you I hate getting into what critics think), let's turn to "The Village" (opening this weekend).

"We are thankful for the time we have been given," says Edward Walker (William Hurt) in monotone, addressing his people, who are gathered for lunch/dinner at a few long wooden tables. He ends there, seemingly trailing away from what he wanted to say. Already, there is a tense energy in the air. Something isn't right. Before this, one of the townspeople buried their child. Victim, apparently, of a gang of creatures that live in the woods surrounding the isolated and puritanical village-town of Covington, Pennsylvania. Run by a group of "elders" headed mostly by Walker and Alice Hunt (Sigourney Weaver), they inform their people that they do not stray into the woods and the creatures do not go into Covington. Their loud and eerie howls fill the air, causing the townspeople's nerves to be on edge. Only the seemingly-crazed Noah Percy (Adrien Brody in a thankless role) seems to find humor and laughs outloud at the noises coming from the forest beyond...

In response to the town's recent death, Alice's fearless son, Lucius (Joaquin Phoenix) announces to the elders that he wants to go into the woods and obtain medicine from a neighboring town. He does so, against their wishes, but is witnessed by one of the creatures to be in their territory. Because of this, all hell breaks loose. The creatures come into town, leaving red marks on every door of every building. Animals are found skinned with twisted necks.

Through all this, Alice addresses the nervous townsfolk, telling them, "we must remain vigilant"...familiar words, especially in light of current world events.

If this isn't enough, Edward's blind daughter, Ivy (Bryce Dallas Howard) has fallen for Lucius because he shares the same traits she carries. He is brave and he knows how to handle himself. He's also very morose and serious and doesn't speak much. This makes him a poor match for Edward's other daughter, Kitty, who was shot down by Lucius after she (embarrassingly) confessed her love for him. It isn't until another tragedy befalls the town that Ivy takes it upon herself to try and learn the mysteries of the woods by continuing Lucius's quest. In doing so, however, she may unlock something a lot darker and more sinister.

Giving anything else away would be grounds for my arrest, trial, and execution.

This movie is brilliant. It's Shyamalan's finest film since "The Sixth Sense" and exactly what "Signs" should have been: smartly written, incredibly clever, beautifully shot, and actually creepy. There is no gore in this film (save for one scene with Brody, but it's minor) and there shouldn't be any gore. Everyone who was expecting a slasher-film came to the wrong movie...looking at Shyamalan's history, you would think that moviegoers would learn that, but no, they continue to complain.

The only problem I had with the movie was the cardboard acting. Everyone seems to be on auto-pilot as they walk through their lines as if they're going through a cold-reading in rehearsals. The only time this works is with Hurt, who expresses so much through his eyes and facial expressions, Phoenix, who seems like he has a chip on his shoulder and Weaver, who seems to be both tired and worried. The actress who steals the show is Bryce Dallas Howard. As Ivy, she is very much human and has fears and worries like the rest of her neighbors. However, she is also driven and keeps cool mainly because she has the luxury of not having her eyesight.

Like all of Night's other films, this one is also leisurely-paced but there's always that underlying tension that gives the film its wings and because of that, it's not boring. Like Rod Serling before him, Shyamalan retains his skill of stringing you along and then trapping you when you least expect it. Again, I won't spoil the ending, but once it's revealed, you may realize that you are actually a PART of the town of Covington and that thought will haunt you long after you leave the theater.

-- Matt

***1/2 out of ****
The new film from gotta have a twist wonderkid is a mess with ideas. The B movie machinations that once seemed clever now feel like imitations. I still feel that a masterpiece lies within Shyamalan and I eagerly await for him to reveal a twist in his career.

Bottom Line: See it if you gotta but curb your expectations or you're in for a collossal disappointment.
Report a problem