Voting
Quality
Age
 
Voting
Quality
Age

Сomments

@katiemourning: Also, there's not much reason to dislike the main characters imo. Charlie's an underdog sort of character, and Pacino's a haunted man. There's not much to dislike there. But whatever, its your opinion, I'm not trying to start a fight, I'm just replying with my own.
This is one of my favorite movies ever. Haven't seen it in a while though, thus why I'm here.
@katiemourning: I can understand your complaints. However, I have to disagree on most points. O'Donnell's character grounds the movie, and his story provides the situation that allows the speech at the end to happen. He seems non-existent because, next to Pacino doing his thing, you have to have someone who grounds it and is kind of like a real person would be if they met Mr. Slade, aka just kind of sitting there in disbelief a lot of the time. If you have someone trying to go toe-to-toe with that character, especially a younger actor like O'Donnell was at the time, its not going to work.
I would also posit that, yes, Pacino's character is somewhat despicable. But that was for a good reason. He was haunted by his mistakes and felt himself irredeemable, thus he wasn't even trying for most of this movie to be a "good" man. And yeah, he's a crude guy, but I also thought he was very funny at times, which offsets some of the crazier things about him. Obviously that was obnoxious to you, which is alright, but to me, he was a very real, flawed, and ultimately good character, especially after O'Donnell redeems him and he comes back to save him at the hearing.
great film! love al pacino!
Report a problem